Gaming Brands

Themed Gaming Gear

Drakonia Black

Sharkoon - Drakonia Black

Voting Results:

0
Design:
0
Features:
0
Durability:
0
Performance:
0
Value:
0
Votes: 0

Review it!

We currently don't have a review of this item.

Want us to get our hands on one and review it? then Let us know:

Quick Features:

The Drakonia Black by Sharkoon uses a Laser sensor from Avago, specifically the ADNS-9800, providing a DPI/CPI range of up to 8200. This results in a tracking speed of 150IPS, and a maximum acceleration of 30 G. It uses a USB connection with a 1.8m (textile sheathing) cable. It weighs in at 150 g without the cable, has Yes (6x 5 g) weights and is approximately 126 x 88.1 x 41.8 mm (LxWxH).

Manufactures description:

The Drakonia Black is the follow-up model to our popular green Drakonia. Like before, the Drakonia Black has eleven buttons and a 4-way scroll wheel, with each being freely programmable through the included configuration software to perform various different functions.

An ADNS-9800 laser sensor from Avago operates under the gray dragon scales casing, with the current DPI setting in use indicated by a constantly illuminating LED.

 
 

Specification

 
 No. of Buttons  11
 No. of Macro Keys 
 No. of Game Profiles 
 Connectivity  USB
 Cable length  1.8m (textile sheathing)
 Wireless 
 Battery 
 Colour 
 Ambidextrous  NO
 Coating 
 Software  Yes
 Weights  Yes (6x 5 g)
 Switch 
 

Sensor

 
 Type  Laser
 Brand  Avago
 Model  ADNS-9800
 Processor 
 Lift off distance  1-5 mm
 DPI/CPI  up to 8200
 Memory Size 
 Max tracking speed  150IPS
 Max acceleration  30 G
 Response time 
 FPS  12,000
 

Lighting

 
 Colour Options  Yes, configurable via software
 Lighting Effect 
 

Dimensions & Weight

 
 Dimension (LxWxH)  126 x 88.1 x 41.8 mm
 Weight (grams) 
 Weight w/o cable  150 g

Gallery

Sharkoon - Drakonia Black (image: 1165)Sharkoon - Drakonia Black (image: 1166)Sharkoon - Drakonia Black (image: 1167)Sharkoon - Drakonia Black (image: 1168)Sharkoon - Drakonia Black (image: 1169)Sharkoon - Drakonia Black (image: 1170)

Compared to: